Commissioners of the CIF continued their discussion on Monday in San Diego toward putting together a proposal that would eliminate language that has given them the authority to make players ineligible for an athletically motivated transfer based on being unhappy with a coach.
One way commissioners have been able to declare players ineligible is when schools show that the parents or the student got into an argument or expressed displeasure with a coach.
That’s the language that would be eliminated under an expected proposal to be voted on by member schools next year, Executive Director Roger Blake said.
Rule 510 has a component where a verbal disagreement with a coach and then a transfer can be evidence of an athletically motivated transfer.
There’s a feeling that parents who know the rule, objected to a coach but didn’t say anything have been able to transfer without any problems. But parents who didn’t know the rule and made a scene about a coach faced a different outcome.
It will be up to the more than 1,500 schools that make up the CIF to vote on whether to eliminate the language.
For the latest on high school sports, follow @LATSondheimer on Twitter